Loading…
For internal audit, compliance teams and the people they audit
Inside your own organisation you are on both sides at once: auditing your departments, and answering the auditor who arrives next quarter. Kimova holds both in one record.
The challenge
Internally, you run audits nobody can find the paperwork for a year later. Externally, you find the gaps the week before the auditor does. It is the same problem twice: what was checked, what was found and what was done about it lives in inboxes and spreadsheets instead of in one place.
Who this is for
You audit your own organisation — departments, processes and systems — on a rolling programme.
Run each audit as its own cycle against the framework it answers to, with the assessments, interview notes, evidence and findings kept together per audit. Nothing sits in a personal drive, and last year's cycle is there in front of you when you plan this year's — so the programme compounds instead of restarting.
Access: The whole programme is yours; each department sees only what you send them.
You have been asked for evidence, or you own a finding raised against your area.
An auditor adds you to the engagement, and you see only what concerns you: the requests addressed to you, and the corrective actions you own. You record the root cause, write the plan, set the date, and close it with the evidence attached — so when the auditor returns, the answer is already on file.
Access: Only your requests and your CAPAs — never the rest of the audit.
What you get
Assessments, notes, evidence and findings kept together — findable a year later.
Policies read against each requirement while there is still time to act.
The people who own the fix own the record, and 'done' arrives with proof attached.
A live view of posture, so the next audit is a confirmation rather than a fire drill.
In the workbench
An engagement runs the whole flow whoever you are. Highlighted below are the stages this way of working leans on hardest.
Use cases