ISO 42001 - Control A.6.2.8 – AI System Recording of Event Logs
Control A.6.2.8 – AI System Recording of Event Logs
In todays article by Kimova AI, we explore Control A.6.2.8 – AI System Recording of Event Logs, a critical control within ISO/IEC 42001 that focuses on maintaining traceability, accountability, and transparency through effective logging of AI system events.
Event logs provide the evidence needed to understand how an AI system behaves in real-world conditions. Without proper logging, organizations lose visibility into system actions, decision pathways, errors, and potential misuse—making governance, audits, and incident investigations extremely difficult.
What This Control Requires
Control A.6.2.8 requires organizations to ensure that AI systems record relevant events throughout their operation in a way that supports monitoring, audits, investigations, and continuous improvement.
Event logging should capture information such as:
- System start, stop, and restart events
- Model execution and decision events
- Input and output records (where appropriate and lawful)
- Configuration changes and model updates
- Access and authentication activities
- Errors, anomalies, and system failures
- Human interventions or overrides
- Security-related events
- Performance and threshold breaches
Logs must be sufficient to reconstruct events, understand AI behaviour, and support accountability.
Why AI Event Logging Matters
AI systems operate at scale and speed. When something goes wrong, organizations must be able to answer questions such as:
- What decision did the AI system make?
- When did it happen?
- What data influenced the decision?
- Was human intervention involved?
- Did the system behave as intended?
- Was there any security or ethical concern?
Without proper logs, these questions cannot be reliably answered.
Effective event logging supports:
- Audit and compliance requirements under ISO 42001 and related standards
- Incident investigation and root-cause analysis
- Detection of bias, drift, or abnormal behaviour
- Security monitoring and breach detection
- Operational oversight and performance monitoring
- Legal defensibility and accountability
Key Logging Principles Under ISO 42001
To meet Control A.6.2.8, organizations should follow these principles:
- Relevance
Log only what is necessary to support governance, compliance, and operational needs.
- Accuracy and Integrity
Logs must be accurate, tamper-resistant, and protected from unauthorized modification.
- Privacy and Data Protection
Ensure logs comply with data protection laws (e.g., GDPR), especially when personal data is involved.
- Retention and Availability
Define retention periods based on legal, regulatory, and business requirements, and ensure logs are retrievable when needed.
- Correlation and Analysis
Logs should be structured to allow correlation across systems, models, and events.
Implementation Guidance
Organizations can implement this control effectively by:
- Defining a logging policy specific to AI systems
- Identifying mandatory AI events that must be logged
- Integrating logs with SIEM and monitoring tools
- Implementing access controls and integrity protection for logs
- Establishing regular log reviews and alerts
- Aligning AI logs with incident response and risk management processes
- Documenting logging configurations and responsibilities
At Kimova AI, we strongly emphasize that event logs are not just technical records—they are essential governance artifacts that demonstrate responsible AI management.
Conclusion
Control A.6.2.8 ensures that AI systems operate with traceability, accountability, and transparency. Proper event logging enables organizations to detect issues early, respond effectively, and demonstrate compliance with ISO 42001 and other regulatory frameworks. By embedding robust logging practices into AI system design and operations, organizations can build trust with stakeholders and uphold the principles of responsible AI.
In tomorrow’s article by Kimova.AI, we’ll explore Annex A Control A.7.1 – Data for AI Systems, where we’ll explore how organizations can ensure that data used for AI is appropriate, high-quality, well-governed, and compliant, forming a reliable foundation for trustworthy AI outcomes.