ISO 42001 - Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities (Clause 6.1)

Created in June 20, 2025

2025   ·   Kimova AI   ISO 42001   AI Management System   AIMS   Responsible AI   AI Governance   AI Compliance   AI Audit   AI Risk Management   AI Ethics   Ethical AI   AI Accountability   AI Transparency   AI Auditing   ISO/IEC 42001   International Standard   Regulatory Compliance   Compliance Technology   TurboAudit   Ask AIMS   Artificial Intelligence   AI     ·   ISO 42001   AI Governance   AI Compliance   Responsible AI   Ask AIMS   TurboAudit  

ISO 42001: Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities (Clause 6.1) with TurboAudit by [Kimova AI](https://kimova.ai)

As organizations begin to integrate AI into their operations, one of the most critical questions they must ask is: What could go wrong, and what can we do about it?

Clause 6.1 of ISO/IEC 42001 addresses this by requiring organizations to take a systematic, forward-looking approach to identify and respond to both risks and opportunities related to their AI systems. This clause forms the backbone of AI governance because it connects intention with action.

What Clause 6.1 Requires

Clause 6.1 mandates that organizations determine:

  • The risks and opportunities that must be addressed to:

    • Ensure the AIMS can achieve its intended outcomes
    • Prevent or reduce undesired effects (such as harm, bias, or non-compliance)
    • Promote continual improvement
  • The need for risk treatment measures, including whether to avoid, reduce, share, or accept specific risks
  • How to integrate and implement actions into AI development, deployment, and monitoring processes
  • How to evaluate the effectiveness of these actions over time

This goes beyond traditional enterprise risk management. AI introduces unique dimensions—algorithmic bias, model drift, explainability issues, and unintended societal impacts—that require specialized attention.

  1. Technical Risks:

    • Inaccurate predictions
    • Model overfitting or underfitting
    • Lack of robustness or resilience

  2. Ethical and Societal Risks:

    • Bias and discrimination
    • Violations of privacy
    • Erosion of public trust

  3. Regulatory and Legal Risks:

    • Non-compliance with AI regulations (e.g., EU AI Act)
    • Intellectual property violations
    • Failure to meet contractual obligations

  4. Operational Risks:

    • Poor integration with business processes
    • Misalignment between AI behavior and user expectations
    • Lack of human oversight or fallback mechanisms

  5. Security Risks:

    • Model poisoning or adversarial attacks
    • Data leaks during training or inference
    • Unauthorized access to AI systems

  6. Reputational Risks:

    • Public backlash over controversial AI outcomes
    • Negative media coverage or loss of customer trust

Identifying Opportunities

While the emphasis is often on risk, organizations are also expected to explore opportunities, such as:

  • Enhancing transparency and trust through explainable AI
  • Automating risk detection and monitoring
  • Using AI to improve internal compliance, audit, and data governance

Recognizing opportunities helps ensure the AIMS isn’t only defensive—it also becomes a source of innovation and competitive advantage.

How to Approach Clause 6.1 Practically

  1. Start with a Risk Register: Identify known and potential risks across your AI lifecycle. This could include technical failure points, regulatory gaps, or stakeholder concerns.

  2. Conduct AI-Specific Impact Assessments: Methods such as algorithmic impact assessments (AIA), fairness audits, and ethical reviews can help evaluate risks in context.

  3. Align with Risk Criteria: Define your risk appetite and tolerance. What kinds of AI-related risks are acceptable? Which ones are not?

  4. Assign Responsibility: Ensure that risk ownership is clearly assigned. For example, the AI governance team might own ethical risks, while engineering owns technical risks.

  5. Plan Treatment Actions: For high-priority risks, define concrete mitigation measures (e.g., adding human-in-the-loop reviews, improving training data quality, or reconfiguring model architecture).

  6. Review and Update Regularly: Risk is not static. Your risk register, treatment plans, and evaluations must be updated regularly to reflect new use cases, regulations, or emerging threats.

Benefits of a Proactive Risk and Opportunity Framework

  • Prevents costly compliance failures or reputational harm
  • Improves system performance and reliability
  • Builds trust with stakeholders and regulators
  • Enables more sustainable and ethical AI practices
  • Helps the organization stay ahead of regulatory changes

Conclusion

Clause 6.1 is where strategic intent meets operational rigor. A responsible AI approach is not one that avoids risk altogether, but one that acknowledges risk honestly, treats it effectively, and monitors it continuously. That’s what this clause is all about.

In tomorrow’s article, we will explore Clause 6.2: AI Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them, and how setting meaningful, measurable goals is key to governing AI systems responsibly and strategically.

Stay tuned, and subscribe if you haven’t already—this journey through ISO 42001 is just the beginning.

Ready to experience the future of auditing? Explore how TurboAudit can transform your audit process. Visit Kimova.ai to learn more and see the power of AI auditor assistance in action.

Try Ask AIMS for Free